@inbook{nokey,

title = {Entangled Dependencies: The Case of the Runaway Domestic Worker Emine in Late Ottoman Istanbul, 1910},

author = {Müge Telci Özbek},

editor = {Anamarija Batista and Viola Müller and Corinna Peres},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-01-01},

booktitle = {Coercion and Wage Labour. Exploring Work Relations through History and Art},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {Keeping Domestic Workers Dependent in Early Twentieth-Century Istanbul},

author = {Müge Telci Özbek},

editor = {Claudia Bernardi and Viola Müller and Biljana Stojić and Vilhelm Vilhelmsson},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-01-01},

booktitle = {Moving Workers: Historical Perspectives on Labour, Coercion and Im/Mobilities},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {Can Historians Speak? A Few Thoughts and Proposals on a Possible Global History of Domestic Service/Work},

author = {Raffaella Sarti},

editor = {Nitin Sinha and Nitin Varma},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

booktitle = {Servants Pasts. Sixteenth to Eighteenth Century. South Asia, vol. 1.},

abstract = {The title of this contribution echoes the influential and controversial article by Gayatri Chakravorti Spivak “Can the Subaltern Speak?” – an inspiring question. However, I will not discuss her argument. Rather, it will highlight a common problem that historians have to face, namely the vocabulary they use. Such a problem seems particularly important in the study of domestic service/work, and even more so if they want to develop a comparative perspective and/or contribute to a possible global history of domestic service/work. The chapter examines the problem and suggests some possible strategies to overcome it and move toward a global history of domestic service/work.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {The servant institution during the Swedish agrarian revolution: the political economy of subservience},

author = {Carolina Uppenberg},

editor = {Jane Whittle},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

booktitle = {Servants in rural Europe 1400–1900},

pages = {167–182},

abstract = {This article develops the gendered aspects of the various dimensions of the servant institution. It is shown that male and female servants had different levels of freedom in their labour contracts, and this is related to the later development of a feminized servant position.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {Entangled Dependencies: The Case of the Runaway Domestic Worker Emine in Late Ottoman Istanbul, 1910},

author = {Müge Telci Özbek},

editor = {Anamarija Batista and Viola Müller and Corinna Peres},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-01-01},

booktitle = {Coercion and Wage Labour. Exploring Work Relations through History and Art},

keywords = {20th century, domestic service, gender, ottoman empire, wage labour},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {Keeping Domestic Workers Dependent in Early Twentieth-Century Istanbul},

author = {Müge Telci Özbek},

editor = {Claudia Bernardi and Viola Müller and Biljana Stojić and Vilhelm Vilhelmsson},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-01-01},

booktitle = {Moving Workers: Historical Perspectives on Labour, Coercion and Im/Mobilities},

keywords = {20th century, dependency, domestic service, migration and mobility, turkey},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {Can Historians Speak? A Few Thoughts and Proposals on a Possible Global History of Domestic Service/Work},

author = {Raffaella Sarti},

editor = {Nitin Sinha and Nitin Varma},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

booktitle = {Servants Pasts. Sixteenth to Eighteenth Century. South Asia, vol. 1.},

abstract = {The title of this contribution echoes the influential and controversial article by Gayatri Chakravorti Spivak “Can the Subaltern Speak?” – an inspiring question. However, I will not discuss her argument. Rather, it will highlight a common problem that historians have to face, namely the vocabulary they use. Such a problem seems particularly important in the study of domestic service/work, and even more so if they want to develop a comparative perspective and/or contribute to a possible global history of domestic service/work. The chapter examines the problem and suggests some possible strategies to overcome it and move toward a global history of domestic service/work.

},

keywords = {domestic service, early modern history, gender, historical semantics, household},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {The servant institution during the Swedish agrarian revolution: the political economy of subservience},

author = {Carolina Uppenberg},

editor = {Jane Whittle},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

booktitle = {Servants in rural Europe 1400–1900},

pages = {167–182},

abstract = {This article develops the gendered aspects of the various dimensions of the servant institution. It is shown that male and female servants had different levels of freedom in their labour contracts, and this is related to the later development of a feminized servant position.

},

keywords = {19th century, domestic service, early modern history, gender, service, sweden, work contracts},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}