{"id":5052,"date":"2023-01-27T12:33:46","date_gmt":"2023-01-27T11:33:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worck.eu\/?p=5052"},"modified":"2023-01-27T12:33:46","modified_gmt":"2023-01-27T11:33:46","slug":"58th-ith-conference-deindustrialization-reindustrialization-and-economic-transitions-transnational-perspectives-from-labour-history-call-for-papers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worck.eu\/2023\/01\/27\/58th-ith-conference-deindustrialization-reindustrialization-and-economic-transitions-transnational-perspectives-from-labour-history-call-for-papers\/","title":{"rendered":"58th ITH Conference: Deindustrialization, Reindustrialization and Economic Transitions \u2013 Transnational Perspectives from Labour History (Call for Papers)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Deadline for Abstracts: 31 January 2023<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>

Linz\/Upper Austria, 7\u20139 September 2023
\nConference Languages: English \/ German<\/p>\n

Industrialization and deindustrialization have been global and combined phenomena ever since the Industrial Revolution. The wave of industrialization associated with England in the late 18th and early 19th centuries formed but one element of a dramatic global restructuring of production which came with the
\nloss and transformation of livelihoods in other parts of the world. India is emblematic for that, as the surge in machine-driven industrialization in England
\nwent hand in hand with the decline if not dismantling of the more craft-based textile industries in India. Since then, we have witnessed many waves of
\ndeindustrialization, reindustrialization and economic transition around the world. These interconnected processes have been accompanied by often dramatic
\nchanges in employment opportunities and the world of work more generally.<\/p>\n

This conference seeks to explore processes that are often described as \u2018deindustrialization\u2019 from a global and historical perspective. It starts from the assumption that the term itself is problematic, as the economic processes leading to deindustrialization at the same time might include processes of
\nreindustrialization. The term itself is also not used widely in different languages: in German \u2018Strukturwandel\u2019 is preferred, in Italian there \u2018ristruccturazione\u2019 and in French we often hear about \u2018modernisation\u2019. The ambivalence of terminology points at the diversity of processes of industrial restructuring: they may be due to shifts of profit expectations between industrial sectors, changing modalities of international capital movements or to the transformation of labour processes and management strategies within a specific industrial sector. Each of these interconnected processes of crisis resolution can result in various forms of spatial relocation, and re-composition of the labour force.<\/p>\n

Hence, we are asking how best to understand the processes of economic and spatial transition, their social and cultural consequences as well as their political
\nfall-outs. We are interested in resistance to economic transitioning processes where industrial capital is leaving one place and moving to another. We would
\nlike to receive paper proposals that seek to recuperate the voices of those most affected by economic transitions, including workers and their communities,
\nadjacent social strata directly affected by industrial restructuring, labour movements and urban as well as rural social movements.
\nFurthermore, we are keen to learn about how these transitions might have changed traditional gender orders and how they might have opened up new
\nethnic divisions. Finally, we wish to pay special attention to how the memory of an industrial past and of specific trajectories of deindustrialization have
\ninfluenced the postindustrial orders that have been emerging in many of the formerly industrial regions. Memory has been a powerful political resource and
\nthe construction of industrial heritage has not just been the nostalgic backdrop to a vibrant tourist industry but also the backbone of resistance towards an
\nundermining of ways of life and of solidaristic collective cultures that characterized industrial societies. Memory has also traveled between old and new
\nsites of de\/industrialization, and can function as a resource informing endeavors to build new solidarities and community-building. Processes of deindustrialization and reindustrialization need to be embedded in wider problems of capitalist development and the tensions between global
\nmarkets and local conditions. If \u2018capital moves\u2019 (Jefferson Cowie), it might fix problems for capitalist development but it also causes problems for those
\nattached to specific localities. Furthermore, processes of industrialization have often caused massive environmental problems, which are left to postindustrial
\nfutures once the industries have gone. Papers dealing with questions of political ecology and energy transition will therefore also be welcome.<\/p>\n

The conference will attempt to shed light on processes of deindustrialization in a global framework paying attention to dramatic forms of deindustrialization and industrial restructuring in the global South as well as the global North including Eastern Europe. The history of developmentalist politics and their failure raises questions about the interrelatedness of developments in the global North and the global South. Focusing on localities and regions where industrial capital has left and\/or has relocated to, the conference wishes to explore the spatial reorganization of capitalism and its conferences in regions and countries around the world. Transregional and comparative studies will be especially welcome. Undoubtedly, so far, studies of deindustrialization have tended to focus on the global North. The conference wishes to develop a de-centered global perspective by bringing in the global South and the interrelatedness of both spatial spheres. It also seeks to draw attention to less well-studied regions\/sites affected by deindustrialization around the world. Finally, being aware that deindustrialization processes arguably go back a long way, this conference will be open to papers on the early modern period as well.
\nDeindustrialization studies has been strongly transdisciplinary and the conference would invite contributions not just from historians but from a range of different disciplines, including the social sciences, geography, anthropology, memory studies, social movement studies and others who have engaged with the types of economic transitions discussed above.<\/p>\n

Submission<\/strong><\/p>\n

Proposed papers should include:<\/p>\n